Who's Better??
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Who's Better??
Hey guys just wondering what combo is better...
Jolly
Hille/Nic Nat
Warnock
or
Sandilands
Hille/Nic Nat
100,200 ruckman that most likely won't play!
Jolly
Hille/Nic Nat
Warnock
or
Sandilands
Hille/Nic Nat
100,200 ruckman that most likely won't play!
timtam- Posts : 10
Join date : 2010-02-18
Re: Who's Better??
I think i like the first one mate only becuase if your taking the risk with hille/nic nat then you will have warnock to cover if things go bad also jolly has the ablitiy to match sandilands and warnock could potential be carltons first ruck and rise in value alot which will also benift your side.
I think with the Sandilands combo yes he is a gun but having a player sitting on your ruck bench that may never play is a real waste.
Finally decision COMBO 2
Cheers Mate Roachie
I think with the Sandilands combo yes he is a gun but having a player sitting on your ruck bench that may never play is a real waste.
Finally decision COMBO 2
Cheers Mate Roachie
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|