Which three way combo Bartell, Gibbs, Kennely, Malcheski, Danger, Ziebel?
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
Which three way combo Bartell, Gibbs, Kennely, Malcheski, Danger, Ziebel?
Dont know which combo to go, bear in mind I also have Waite, Ladson and Hunt in my backs atm all coming back from injury!!!
This involves my
number 3 mid, number 5 back and number 7 forward position.
Bartel, Malcheski, Danger
Bartel, Kenelly, Ziebel
Gibbs, Kenelly, Danger
I cant get the top three priced players Bartel, Kennely and Danger. I am fairly convinced Mal can be as good as Kennely particularly as I feel Kennely can sometimes cop a forward tag, its just all the knee injuries I have down back thats a little worrying thanks to fatcat getting in my head!
What is the best combo
This involves my
number 3 mid, number 5 back and number 7 forward position.
Bartel, Malcheski, Danger
Bartel, Kenelly, Ziebel
Gibbs, Kenelly, Danger
I cant get the top three priced players Bartel, Kennely and Danger. I am fairly convinced Mal can be as good as Kennely particularly as I feel Kennely can sometimes cop a forward tag, its just all the knee injuries I have down back thats a little worrying thanks to fatcat getting in my head!
What is the best combo
tony8210- Posts : 573
Join date : 2009-06-01
Age : 50
Location : Darwin
Re: Which three way combo Bartell, Gibbs, Kennely, Malcheski, Danger, Ziebel?
IMO,
Gibbs ahead of Bartel; the kid is on the up, I don't know if Bartel can sustain it.
Kennelly ahead of Malcheski; for the knee reason.
Dangerfield ahead of Zeibell; Danger has more support than Jack. Either of them would be a handy #7 Fwd. Nice problem to have.
Gibbs ahead of Bartel; the kid is on the up, I don't know if Bartel can sustain it.
Kennelly ahead of Malcheski; for the knee reason.
Dangerfield ahead of Zeibell; Danger has more support than Jack. Either of them would be a handy #7 Fwd. Nice problem to have.
megatron- Posts : 43
Join date : 2010-02-20
Age : 40
Location : Melbourne
Re: Which three way combo Bartell, Gibbs, Kennely, Malcheski, Danger, Ziebel?
Megatron summed it up well.
gibbs will be like selwood and rise again.
kennelly/malceski either way for me. both will play similar roles.
i would get danger ahead of ziebell as he has better support like megatron said. also he has 1 more year experience and is entering his 3rd year.
gibbs will be like selwood and rise again.
kennelly/malceski either way for me. both will play similar roles.
i would get danger ahead of ziebell as he has better support like megatron said. also he has 1 more year experience and is entering his 3rd year.
Dom- Posts : 447
Join date : 2009-05-27
Age : 30
Location : Melbourne
Similar topics
» Pav/Gia or Okeefe/Ziebel?????
» Pendlebury, Selwood or Gibbs
» Danger / Tippett - Add to the injury woes....
» Danger... Decisions, decisions
» Pendlebury, Selwood or Gibbs
» Danger / Tippett - Add to the injury woes....
» Danger... Decisions, decisions
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|