Vince or...

Well... I've heard that he has a niggle and stuff, and I've also heard that Adelaide are playing it down and that it's actually worse than what they let on... So I was wondering if there is any merrit to it?

Either way, I'm looking to possibly, maybe incorporate a Bomber Midfielder into my side.. So I was thinking... Would a Watson/Stanton be better than a Vince, or should I stay clear? I have $124k to play with atm.

What do you guys think?

yes I do barrack for the bombers, and no, I have not got one starting on my field

I am a bomber too nuffman but i strongly advise you steer clear of them. There are so many better options.

yeah there are better options out there below 600k with the money left over. maybe get a selwood, gibbs or mitchell in there instead.

got hooker (like the looks of him from last year and saved me finals time) and stanton (revolving in and out of 3rd mid for me) so far. i wanted to get at least 1 bomber in, so hooker is a lock for me .

Yeh I get what you mean Bonnie...

Yeh Dom, Hooker was a life saver a few times last year.. he's looking very impressive so far this year! iirc 2 scores over 100 so far...

How about Atkinson if your after a Bomber??? I've had him in and out of the 4th/5th spot in my backline, (currently out for Waite in a rejigged line up but...)

I also agree with Bonnie Doon, I'd avoid Watson and Stanton.

Why does everyone want Atkinson? He has played 4
games last year scoring 2 low scores and two high. He is way too
inconstistent for 343 thousnad dollars. Never buy him